Mulberry Silkworm vs Tasar Silkworm: Which Is Better for Silk Production in Sericulture?

Last Updated Apr 9, 2025

Mulberry silkworms are the primary source of high-quality silk, producing smooth, fine, and lustrous fibers ideal for luxury textiles. Tasar silkworms, on the other hand, yield wild silk with a coarser texture and natural golden hue, suited for more rustic and durable fabrics. The choice between mulberry and tasar silkworms depends on the desired silk quality and fabric application in sericulture.

Table of Comparison

Feature Mulberry Silkworm (Bombyx mori) Tasar Silkworm (Antheraea mylitta)
Silk Type Mulberry silk (white, fine, smooth) Tasar silk (wild silk, golden-brown)
Host Plant Mulberry leaves (Morus species) Sal tree (Shorea robusta) and other host plants
Domestication Fully domesticated Semi-domesticated / wild
Climate Requirement Temperate to subtropical Tropical and deciduous forest regions
Silk Production Cycle Approximately 25-30 days Approximately 40-50 days
Silk Yield Higher yield (about 200-500 mg cocoon weight) Lower yield (about 60-120 mg cocoon weight)
Silk Quality Soft, lustrous, easily bleached and dyed Coarser, textured, naturally colored
Economic Value High commercial value, global market Moderate market demand, niche product
Geographical Distribution China, India, Japan, Korea, others India (central and eastern regions), limited elsewhere
Use High-end textiles, fashion, upholstery Traditional textiles, rugs, handicrafts

Overview of Mulberry Silkworm and Tasar Silkworm

The Mulberry silkworm (Bombyx mori) is the primary source of high-quality white silk and is extensively cultivated globally under controlled conditions on mulberry leaves, yielding a silk fiber that is fine and uniform. Tasar silkworms (Antheraea species), native to India and Southeast Asia, produce wild silk known for its coarse texture and natural golden hue, thriving on diverse host plants like Arjun and Asan trees in open forest environments. While Mulberry silk dominates commercial production due to its fine quality and yield, Tasar silk holds cultural and economic importance in indigenous and tribal communities, contributing to regional sericulture biodiversity.

Habitat Requirements: Mulberry vs Tasar Silkworms

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) thrive in temperate regions with abundant mulberry foliage, requiring a controlled environment with consistent humidity (70-85%) and temperature (23-28degC) for optimal silk yield. Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta) are adapted to tropical and subtropical forests, feeding on wild host plants like Arjun, Asan, and Terminalia species, with greater tolerance to fluctuating temperature and humidity typical of open and semi-open forest habitats. The distinct habitat requirements impact the cultivation methods and economic feasibility of sericulture in different geographic regions.

Life Cycle Comparison: Mulberry vs Tasar Silkworms

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) exhibit a controlled four-stage life cycle--egg, larva, pupa, and adult moth--typically completed within 30-40 days under optimal conditions, enabling multiple production cycles annually. Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta), native to forest ecosystems, have a longer life cycle of approximately 40-60 days, with a pupal stage adapted to natural environmental variations, limiting continuous cultivation efficiency. The rapid growth and complete domestication of mulberry silkworms result in higher silk yield consistency compared to the season-dependent and semi-domesticated tasar silkworms.

Cocoon and Silk Yield Differences

Mulberry silkworms produce smooth, uniform cocoons with a higher silk filament length, yielding approximately 1,000 to 1,500 meters of silk per cocoon, which is ideal for high-quality silk production. Tasar silkworms generate coarser, less uniform cocoons with shorter filaments, resulting in a lower silk yield of about 200 to 400 meters per cocoon, suitable for coarse silk textiles. The difference in cocoon structure and filament length directly impacts the texture, strength, and commercial value of the resulting silk.

Silk Quality: Mulberry Silk vs Tasar Silk

Mulberry silk, produced by the Bombyx mori silkworm, is renowned for its fine texture, high tensile strength, and lustrous appearance, making it the highest quality silk globally. In contrast, Tasar silk, derived from Antheraea mylitta and related species, has a coarser texture with a natural golden sheen, valued for its rustic appeal but lower tensile strength. Mulberry silk's uniform filament length and smooth protein composition ensure superior softness and durability compared to the more textured, less uniform fibers of Tasar silk.

Economic Viability in Silk Production

Mulberry silkworms dominate commercial silk production due to their higher yield and superior quality of silk, making them more economically viable for large-scale operations. Tasar silkworms produce wild silk that is coarser and less in quantity, resulting in lower market value and limited industrial use. The mulberry silk industry benefits from established supply chains and higher demand, contributing to its greater profitability compared to tasar silk production.

Disease Resistance and Management

Mulberry silkworms exhibit higher susceptibility to common diseases such as pebrine and flacherie, necessitating rigorous disease management including regular disinfection and selective breeding for resistant strains. Tasar silkworms demonstrate greater resilience against environmental pathogens but face challenges from fungal infections like powdery mildew, requiring integrated pest management strategies and host plant sanitation. Effective disease resistance in both species hinges on continuous monitoring, proper hygiene, and genetic improvements to enhance silk yield and quality.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) rely on mulberry leaves cultivated in controlled environments, often requiring intensive water and fertilizer inputs, contributing to environmental strain. Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta) thrive on wild host plants like Terminalia and Shorea species in forest ecosystems, promoting biodiversity conservation and supporting sustainable agroforestry practices. Compared to mulberry sericulture, tasar silk production maintains ecological balance with lower chemical inputs and better adaptability to natural habitats, enhancing overall environmental sustainability.

Market Demand and Export Potential

Mulberry silkworm silk dominates global markets due to its higher quality and consistency, driving strong demand in textile industries and boosting export potential notably in countries like China and India. Tasar silkworm silk, though valued for its unique texture and natural golden color, caters mainly to niche markets and regional crafts, limiting its export scale but offering opportunities in eco-friendly and artisanal segments. Market trends favor mulberry silk for large-scale industrial use, while tasar silk's growing popularity in specialty markets supports sustainable rural economies.

Challenges and Future Prospects

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) face challenges such as vulnerability to diseases and dependence on mulberry leaves, limiting their adaptability, while Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta) struggle with inconsistent silk quality and less developed breeding techniques. Future prospects include genetic improvement and enhanced disease resistance for mulberry silkworms, alongside habitat preservation and biotechnological interventions to standardize Tasar silk production. Integrating sustainable practices and advanced sericulture technologies can boost production efficiency and economic returns in both silkworm varieties.

Related Important Terms

Mulberry Host-Specificity

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) exhibit high host-specificity, exclusively feeding on mulberry leaves, which ensures consistent silk quality and yield in sericulture. In contrast, Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta) are polyphagous, feeding on various forest trees, resulting in coarser silk with wider environmental adaptability but lower uniformity.

Tasar Wild-Rearing Zones

Tasar silkworms, primarily reared in wild Tasar zones across central and eastern India, produce coarser silk with natural golden hues, adapting well to open, forested environments unlike the mulberry silkworm which thrives in controlled mulberry plantations. The Tasar wild-rearing zones offer sustainable sericulture opportunities by leveraging indigenous host plants like Arjun and Asan, supporting traditional livelihoods and biodiversity conservation.

Bivoltine Hybridization

Bivoltine hybrids of mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) exhibit superior silk yield and quality compared to tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta), which primarily produce coarse silk from wild or semi-domesticated strains. The controlled hybridization of bivoltine mulberry silkworms enhances filament length, tensile strength, and uniformity, optimizing commercial silk production efficiency.

Non-Mulberry Silviculture

Tasar silkworms, key species in non-mulberry sericulture, thrive on forest-based host plants like Arjun and Asan, producing coarse, robust silk differing from the fine, lustrous silk of mulberry silkworms raised exclusively on mulberry leaves. Non-mulberry silviculture supports biodiversity and rural livelihoods by utilizing diverse host trees, expanding silk production beyond the controlled environments required for mulberry sericulture.

Silkworm Disease Resistance Genes

Mulberry silkworm (Bombyx mori) exhibits higher expression of disease resistance genes such as BmRel and BmZnSOD, enhancing its resilience against common viral and bacterial infections in sericulture. In contrast, Tasar silkworm (Antheraea mylitta) shows a diverse range of immune-related genes, including antimicrobial peptides, adapted for robustness in wild conditions but with relatively lower controlled environment disease resistance.

Tropical Sericulture Clusters

Mulberry silkworms dominate tropical sericulture clusters due to their high yield of fine, lustrous silk and adaptability to intensive farming on mulberry leaves, contributing significantly to commercial silk production. Tasar silkworms are preferred in tropical sericulture regions with suitable forest-based ecosystems, producing coarser, wild silk that supports local livelihoods through sustainable, low-input rearing practices.

Tasar Cocoon Surface Microstructure

Tasar silkworm cocoons exhibit a rougher and more porous surface microstructure compared to the smooth and dense surface of mulberry silkworm cocoons, impacting dye uptake and texture in silk production. This distinctive microstructure of Tasar cocoons contributes to their coarser fiber quality, making Tasar silk ideal for producing robust textiles with natural luster.

Mulberry Varietal Productivity

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) exhibit significantly higher silk yield due to optimized mulberry varietal productivity, with select varieties like S-1635 and V1 providing enhanced leaf biomass and quality for efficient cocoon production. In contrast, Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta) rely on wild host plants, resulting in lower and less predictable silk output, making mulberry varietal improvements crucial for maximizing industrial sericulture efficiency.

Silk Yield Comparative Analytics

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) produce higher silk yield with an average of 400-500 meters of silk thread per cocoon, compared to Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta), which yield approximately 80-120 meters. The sericulture industry favors mulberry silkworms for commercial silk production due to their consistent high-quality silk output and ease of controlled cultivation.

Climate-Adapted Silkworm Strains

Mulberry silkworms (Bombyx mori) thrive in moderate climates with controlled humidity, making them ideal for regions with stable temperatures and access to mulberry leaves, while Tasar silkworms (Antheraea mylitta) are adapted to tropical and subtropical climates, capable of feeding on diverse host plants like Arjun and Asan trees. Climate-adapted silkworm strains enhance silk yield and quality by aligning species-specific environmental tolerances with local ecological conditions, improving sericulture productivity.

Mulberry silkworm vs Tasar silkworm for silk production Infographic

Mulberry Silkworm vs Tasar Silkworm: Which Is Better for Silk Production in Sericulture?


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Mulberry silkworm vs Tasar silkworm for silk production are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet